Noah and the Flood Genesis is the first book of the Holy Bible. The book of Genesis contains, a creation story, Noah and the great flood, and accounts for Abraham, and Jacob.
Evidence of this can be found in the large quantity of books and journal articles that have been published on the narrative art of biblical prose stories in the Hebrew Bible Old Testament. Within the book of Genesis, the cycles of narratives about Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph have of course been abundantly analyzed, as have the primeval accounts of Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, and the Tower of Babel.
A glaring omission from this list is the important story of Noah and his family in Genesis 6—9. Because of a wealth of comparative evidence for the Flood story from the ancient world, many scholarly discussions of the biblical Flood story center on its similarities and differences with these other narratives, particularly those from Mesopotamia.
The purpose of the present study is to attempt an analysis of the biblical Noah narrative by applying current literary techniques  in order to gain a greater understanding of that narrative as a whole.
Before moving on to the analysis, it is first necessary to define the parameters of this study.
The primary text will be Genesis 6: Latter-day Saints enjoy the benefit of having Moses 7—8 to expound on and clarify several points that are unclear or missing from the biblical text.
Information from the Book of Moses will also be brought forth when it is relevant. Considering the importance of Noah and the Flood in the Bible, it is somewhat surprising that they do not attract more attention in the canon, receiving relatively few scattered references throughout the standard works see Isaiah These references are not of particular relevance to this study and thus will not be analyzed.
I will analyze each category of character while of course giving special attention to Noah and God for their larger roles in the plot. The text thus places emphasis on the importance of males and females of all species, most importantly humans, for the proper functioning of the earth. This becomes even more important when the earth must be repopulated after the Flood.
While God established his covenant only with Noah before the Flood see 6: According to the classification above, Noah is a type character. A primary reason for this is revealed by a careful reading that immediately uncovers something shocking: Noah never speaks in the entire pericope!
This is shocking because nearly every major character in Hebrew narratives has direct quotation attributed to him or her. For example, Robert Alter notes that biblical narrative often introduces the speech of one character and then, after the recorded speech, notes that the same character speaks again without allowing the other character to participate in the dialogue.
An example of this is in 9: He never seems confused or baffled; he simply does exactly as his deity commands. There are certainly plenty of opportunities for the author of the account to allow him a response, but such never occurs.
Why should the convention be altered here? I suggest that the author of the account deliberately refused Noah any direct speech to make a point: God is in charge, not humankind. The God who greatly influences the flow of history could not entrust the important mission of repopulating the earth to someone who was not worthy of it.
The text reinforces multiple times that Noah indeed was worthy to be such a servant: Appropriately, the Moses account also portrays Noah mostly as a silent servant, but it does accord Noah, the preacher of righteousness, one very fitting speech:Noah's ark and the flood Points of similarity between the Babylonian and Noachian flood stories.
Sponsored link. Comparing the stories. The Chaldean Flood Tablets from the city of Ur in what is now Southern Iraq contain a story that describes how the Bablylonian god Enlil had been bothered by the incessant noise generated by humans. He convinced the other gods to completely exterminate every.
Essay on Comparing Noah and the Ark and The Story of the Great Flood - Comparing Noah and the Ark and The Story of the Great Flood "The Story of the Great Flood" and the account of Noah and the ark are two similar stories in regards to their general message, however both are very different.
For example, the religious doctrine is based on the belief originated from New story. Many religions believe that there is only one God, and not more than God.
This idea not only in Christianity, Judaism and Islam, but at the same time. Contrary to popular belief, the Bible was not the originator of the story of Noah and the Great Flood. In ancient Babyloniaand even more ancient Sumeriathe same story was recorded thousands of years before the Bible was written.4/4(1).
Noah and the Ark The story of Noah and the ark is probably one of the most read stories of the bible. Perhaps it is because of the great tragedy it portrays, or because it is a story of salvation. Noah and his family along with the animals were saved from the flood, while the other people and animals perished as a .
Narrative Art in the Noah Story. Jared Pfost. Jared Pfost was a senior in ancient Near Eastern studies when this paper was presented. The last few decades have seen the emergence and eventually the mainstream acceptance of “literary” studies in the wider field of biblical studies.